For those who care more about other parts of my life, you’ll have to keep waiting for a little while. I’m taking a short break only because I just received an email I’ve been waiting for for nearly two years.
Thanks for your continued patience.
In May 2010, I submitted a thing to a thing to be considered for publication. It was a final paper I’d written for my American Literature History class.
It is now almost February 2012. My thing has finally been reviewed by a reviewer and an executive editor, and it sounds encouraging:
Reviewer Comments to Author:
Consulting Editor: 1
Comments to the Author
This is a well-written and generally convincing reading. Several emendations might be made.(a) Improve the opening paragraph by eliminating the first-person reference. There is no need for it here.
(b) On page 3, re-consider the first whole paragraph and its argument re: the color green. This paragraph is unconvincing. It makes too much of a single word and thus weakens the overall argument of the paper.
(c) Consider using the term ‘binaries’ alongside ‘pairs’ in order to vary word choice.
Overall this is a good close reading.
Executive Editor Comments:
Consulting Editor: 1
Comments to the Author
Very nice piece on a neglected story. I agree with the preliminary reader that the first person reference is unnecessary if not distracting. I didn’t have the same problem with the paragraph on green, however. While I see the point that too much emphasis is placed on the color, Ellison did put it there and it does connect to the earlier reference. I would recommend the author consider how he might rewrite that paragraph imagining how she might win over a resisting reader. Strengthen the argument for green as a symbol by insisting it’s not there by accident. A strong essay.
Time for a little revision. And a little (or a lot) more waiting. Being published in an academic, peer-reviewed journal would be a nice touch to my last semester.
Congrats! That’s an awesome response. 🙂
You RULE!